Jump to content

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 February 7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

< Wikipedia:Files for deletion

< February 6	February 8 >

February 7

ILBLogo_with_moon.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ILBLogo_with_moon.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dylanrush (notify | contribs).

orpahned image, recently absent uploader, likley used on a deleted article on the subject Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:15, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Nouvelle_image_(1).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) An image with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nouvelle_image_(1).png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Calcul (notify | contribs).

orpahend image, unsure of any encyclipedic use of this user created graphic, is blocking an image from Commons Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:17, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No apparent encyclopedic value. Looks like someone's drawing experiments. •••Life of Riley (talk) 16:52, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Nouvelle_image_(2).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) An image with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nouvelle_image_(2).png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Calcul (notify | contribs).

orpahend image, unsure of any encyclipedic use of this user created graphic, is blocking an image from Commons Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:18, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No apparent encyclopedic value. Looks like someone's drawing experiments. •••Life of Riley (talk) 16:52, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Nouvelle_image.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) An image with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nouvelle_image.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Calcul (notify | contribs).

orpahend image, unsure of any encyclipedic use of this user created graphic, is blocking an image from Commons Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No apparent encyclopedic value. Looks like someone's drawing experiments. •••Life of Riley (talk) 16:52, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

215_Liquid_Banner.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:215_Liquid_Banner.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by FenixSolutions (notify | contribs).

orphaned animated gif, sole contributionof user, likely used in a deleted article, I question the free license applied Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:26, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Daystem_logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daystem_logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dasystem (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, absent uploader, is either a non-free logo or an unencyclopedic personal design. Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:35, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The_Orb_A_003.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:The_Orb_A_003.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kim_Ross (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, sole contiribution of user, unsure of any encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:38, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Global_reach_muegge.cc.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Global_reach_muegge.cc.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Autoterm (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, replaced by File:Global reach muegge.cc 2007-01-26.JPG Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:40, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mankind.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mankind.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Harvey "Two-Face" Dent (notify | contribs).

Fails NFCC requirement #1: No free equivalent. Mick Foley is a living person and free images can be created to be placed into the article about the subject. — Moe ε 02:46, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Booney.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Booney.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Booney2k6 (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:49, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unencyclopedic personal photograph. Wikipedia is not MySpace and not a repository of personal photographs. •••Life of Riley (talk) 17:00, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Masonia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Masonia.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Masonia (notify | contribs).

orphaned image, uploader's only edits were to this and long-since deleted article Masonia. Chick Bowen 03:59, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

DanielWebster DartmouthCollegeCase.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DanielWebster DartmouthCollegeCase.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kane5187 (notify | contribs).

Uses merely decorate mentions of the subject; none is needed for reader understanding. Fails WP:NFCC#8 —teb728 t c 05:14, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Youthsalute.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Youthsalute.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Andymusgrave (notify | contribs).

This file was uploaded to illustrate the hoax article Parfact, which has been deleted. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parfact. See also File:Linguist.jpg, another file for this hoax article, also up for deletion, uploaded by the same contributor. •••Life of Riley (talk) 05:43, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No conceivable encyclopedic use. Jll (talk) 21:44, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No possible encyclopedic use, created for a hoax article. Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 15:26, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

MA Obstacle.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MA Obstacle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Funkipus (notify | contribs).

This image was uploaded to illustrate the now-deleted article The MA Obstacle Course. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The MA Obstacle Course. Life of Riley (talk) 05:58, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

IMG 1937.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMG 1937.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sr46mc47krna (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 09:44, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unencyclopedic personal photograph. Wikipedia is not MySpace and not a repository of personal photographs. •••Life of Riley (talk) 17:02, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Mflogo83908943058430950-340-5.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mflogo83908943058430950-340-5.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Markeez14 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 09:47, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Mighty ReArranger Special.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mighty ReArranger Special.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Koavf (notify | contribs).

recoloured version of the non-free image already used in the article's lead. The colour change can easily be described with (free) text and as such the image fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 12:16, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

No Remorse.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Fails WP:NFCC#1. The difference in the cover is understandable with the text. There was nothing noted that was controversial or notable about the alternate cover. -Nv8200p talk 23:56, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:No Remorse.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wiki alf (notify | contribs).

alternate cover that is, except for the shade used and the omission of text, identical to the non-free one in top of the article's infobox. The small differences can be described with (free) text instead of this image and as such it fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 12:17, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Cover is limited edition and not an alternative, and is an entirely new of the artwork which includes much more detail than the original.--Alf ^melmac 06:33, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - But in thumbnail view - where most reader's see it - the differences are trivial and easily described. As a casual reader I cannot see any significant difference, certainly none that requires this image to significantly increase my understanding - Peripitus (Talk) 11:11, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - If one is not interested in either the cover artwork or the use or development of the band's 'logo' - which this is one of the better examples of - see (Motörhead#Cover art) then it could be described in words and save 117 KB, but even viewed in thumbnails the difference between the two is obvious, if viewed side by side, even more so, I contend it it more than just duplication that can easy be done away with.--Alf ^melmac
  - To keep the image we need a reader to gain significant understanding of the topic, above that which they would gain by seeing the first image and reading the text "For the leather effect sleeve edition, the artwork was significantly lightened and the text removed"...I can't see this significant increase in understanding of the topic by omitting the image. - Peripitus (Talk) 20:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - If that is the state of the current wiki-generated usage policies - very little indeed of any of the album covers give this "significant understanding" - I do know that after searching for a good image to compare the two side by side - I came up with nothing useful (and two years later I only find one possible image on google image searching - but still inferior for anyone wanting to make the comparison - I wholeheartedly believe the removal prevents those interested in making the comparison thermselves without having to track off wikipedia and look elsewhere - it is not like it is "identical" in the way a lot of other record covers are - the same image photo with a different coloured background - It is obvious to the unedecated reader the entire artwork has been redone, whether or not this was by their usual artist (Joe Petagno) or not I have yet to find, but if the current rules disallow actually will disallow such I won't be bothering much to find more data about it.--Alf ^melmac 08:12, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not identical by any standard of definition and certainly there are significant differences between versions. Enough to keep anyway. – B.hotep •talk• 12:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yet the image can be adequately replaced (without significantly degrading reader's understanding) by the text "the Leather effect sleeve edition of No Remorse had the text removed, artwork lightened and a fine cloth-like texture added" . Unless changing to this would significantly decrease understanding the image fails WP:NFCC#1. What does the reader lose with the change to this text that is so important ? - Peripitus (Talk) 20:40, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as failing NFCC#1, #3a, and #8. Stifle (talk) 11:24, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Velocity green cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Velocity green cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pele Merengue (notify | contribs).

alternate cover that is, except for the colour used, identical to the non-free one in top of the article's infobox. The small differences can be described with (free) text instead of this image and as such it fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 12:18, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Velocity blue cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Velocity blue cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pele Merengue (notify | contribs).

alternate cover that is, except for the colour used, identical to the non-free one in top of the article's infobox. The small differences can be described with (free) text instead of this image and as such it fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 12:18, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Trivium - Ascendancy Special Edition.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trivium - Ascendancy Special Edition.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jknobull (notify | contribs).

alternate cover that is very similar to the non-free one in top of the article's infobox. The small differences can be described with (free) text instead of this image and as such it fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 12:20, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Janet jackson again japanese cd.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Janet jackson again japanese cd.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Reqluce (notify | contribs).

alternate cover that is, except for addition of the text block at the base, identical to the non-free one in top of the article's infobox. The small differences can be described with (free) text instead of this image and as such it fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 12:22, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Janet jackson someone to call my lover us promo cd cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Janet jackson someone to call my lover us promo cd cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Reqluce (notify | contribs).

alternate cover that is, except for the background colour, identical to the non-free one in top of the article's infobox. The small differences can be described with (free) text instead of this image and as such it fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 12:22, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Janet Jackson - Because Of Love UK 7-inch.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Janet Jackson - Because Of Love UK 7-inch.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Funk Junkie (notify | contribs).

alternate cover that is, except for changes not really visible in thumbnail, identical to another non-free one in the article's infobox. The small differences can be described with (free) text instead of this image and as such it fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 12:24, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Madonna american life aus cd2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madonna american life aus cd2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Reqluce (notify | contribs).

alternate cover that is, except for the colour used, identical to the non-free one above it in the article's infobox. The small differences can be described with (free) text instead of this image and as such it fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 12:26, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Csiiexclusivescover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Csiiexclusivescover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tabanger (notify | contribs).

alternate cover that is, except for the some small differences, identical to the non-free one in top of the article's infobox. The differences can be easily described with (free) text instead of this image and as such it fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 12:27, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Janet jackson runaway japanese 3 inch cd single cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Janet jackson runaway japanese 3 inch cd single cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Reqluce (notify | contribs).

alternate cover that is, except for the addition of the text box in the base, identical to the non-free one in top of the article's infobox. The differences can be easily described with (free) text instead of this image and as such it fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 12:28, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

High and Dry Planet Telex CD2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:High and Dry Planet Telex CD2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Imdanumber1 (notify | contribs).

alternate cover that is, except for background colour, largely identical to the non-free one in the top of the article's infobox. The small differences can be easily described with (free) text instead of this image and as such it fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 12:29, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Byobukcdr.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Byobukcdr.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gracz54 (notify | contribs).

Cover of a single that is so simple it could be adequately described with (free) text and as such fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 12:31, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Byob7lepd.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Byob7lepd.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gracz54 (notify | contribs).

alternate cover that is, except for fact it's printed on a CD, largely identical to the non-free one in the top of the article's infobox. The small differences can be easily described with (free) text instead of this image and as such it fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 12:31, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Back_to_back.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Back_to_back.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Koiyu (notify | contribs).

Unused fanart of some characters from a webcomic who's article was PRODed. Absent uploader Sherool (talk) 12:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

AutoHOF.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:AutoHOF.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hunterstl (notify | contribs).

Not used, also looks like a photo of a plaque that is probably copyrighted. Absent uploader. Sherool (talk) 12:44, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Yamakami-Venice2006-02.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yamakami-Venice2006-02.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tomoyuki_Yamakami (notify | contribs).

Unused personal photo. Sherool (talk) 12:52, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unencyclopedic personal photograph. Wikipedia is not MySpace and not a repository of personal photographs. •••Life of Riley (talk) 17:09, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Yamakami-Toronto-harbor01.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yamakami-Toronto-harbor01.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tomoyuki_Yamakami (notify | contribs).

Unused personal photo. Sherool (talk) 12:52, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unencyclopedic personal photograph. Wikipedia is not MySpace and not a repository of personal photographs. •••Life of Riley (talk) 17:09, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

3stars.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:3stars.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Drinkinhand (notify | contribs).

Not used, also not too great qualty (fuzzy around the edges due to the JPEG compression). Sherool (talk) 13:42, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Geez_Louise(Fade1).ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Geez_Louise(Fade1).ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Drinkinhand (notify | contribs).

Not used, also no confirmation that the uploader have the rights to release this 1minute clip of the song (from the Retarder album I believe). Sherool (talk) 13:45, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Modified Minebea PM-9.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Modified Minebea PM-9.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ominae (notify | contribs).

Image uses "non-free fair use"-licence. But, I'm sorry, images of existing weapons or military units can easily be created by anyone. I see no reason why copyright should be violated here. DavidDCM (talk) 15:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Minebea PM-9.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Minebea PM-9.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ominae (notify | contribs).

Image uses "non-free fair use"-licence. But, I'm sorry, images of existing weapons or military units can easily be created by anyone. I see no reason why copyright should be violated here. DavidDCM (talk) 15:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

MGP SMGs family.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MGP SMGs family.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ominae (notify | contribs).

Image uses "non-free fair use"-licence. But, I'm sorry, images of existing weapons or military units can easily be created by anyone. I see no reason why copyright should be violated here. DavidDCM (talk) 15:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

ARD training.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ARD training.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ominae (notify | contribs).

Image uses "non-free fair use"-licence. But, I'm sorry, images of existing weapons or military units can easily be created by anyone. I see no reason why copyright should be violated here. DavidDCM (talk) 15:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

ARD CQB tactics.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ARD CQB tactics.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ominae (notify | contribs).

Image uses "non-free fair use"-licence. But, I'm sorry, images of existing weapons or military units can easily be created by anyone. I see no reason why copyright should be violated here. DavidDCM (talk) 15:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

ARD Urban Warfare.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ARD Urban Warfare.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ominae (notify | contribs).

Image uses "non-free fair use"-licence. But, I'm sorry, images of existing weapons or military units can easily be created by anyone. I see no reason why copyright should be violated here. DavidDCM (talk) 15:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

ARD training.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ARD training.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ominae (notify | contribs).

Image uses "non-free fair use"-licence. But, I'm sorry, images of existing weapons or military units can easily be created by anyone. I see no reason why copyright should be violated here. DavidDCM (talk) 15:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

ENB School - Official Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ENB School - Official Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Crazy-dancing (notify | contribs).

Obsolete non-free logo, has been replaced by this version Crazy-dancing (talk) 16:00, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Divine_screenshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Divine_screenshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fieryprophet (notify | contribs).

Not used, assosiated article was PRODed. Absent uploader. Sherool (talk) 16:02, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Divine0.1.3a_Screenshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Divine0.1.3a_Screenshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fieryprophet (notify | contribs).

Not used, assosiated article was PRODed. Absent uploader. Sherool (talk) 16:03, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Divine_01.1.2a_screenshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Divine_01.1.2a_screenshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fieryprophet (notify | contribs).

Not used, assosiated article was PRODed. Absent uploader. Sherool (talk) 16:04, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Preethi.Jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Preethi.Jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Axis48 (notify | contribs).

Unused personal photo. Sherool (talk) 16:18, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unencyclopedic personal photograph. Wikipedia is not MySpace and not a repository of personal photographs. •••Life of Riley (talk) 17:10, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Darren_lin.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Darren_lin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Axis48 (notify | contribs).

Unused personal photo. Sherool (talk) 16:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unencyclopedic personal photograph. Wikipedia is not MySpace and not a repository of personal photographs. •••Life of Riley (talk) 17:10, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The hungry bear.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:The hungry bear.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Heat178 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic; candid snapshot with joke summary, person with no apparent or asserted notability. Michael Devore (talk) 16:22, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unencyclopedic personal photograph. Wikipedia is not MySpace and not a repository of personal photographs. •••Life of Riley (talk) 17:10, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The hungry bearr.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:The hungry bearr.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Heat178 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic; candid snapshot with joke summary, person with no apparent or asserted notability. Michael Devore (talk) 16:24, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unencyclopedic personal photograph. Wikipedia is not MySpace and not a repository of personal photographs. •••Life of Riley (talk) 17:10, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

MyPicture1012justinisobe.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MyPicture1012justinisobe.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JIsobe (notify | contribs).

Orphaned; picture of person with no apparent or asserted notability. Michael Devore (talk) 16:27, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unencyclopedic personal photograph. Wikipedia is not MySpace and not a repository of personal photographs. •••Life of Riley (talk) 17:10, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

DSC01376.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC01376.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tejaspulisetty (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic; blurry low-quality picture of Sony Playstation Portable subsequently replaced in PSP article with better images. Michael Devore (talk) 16:29, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Me!!! 023.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Me!!! 023.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cavscout19d (notify | contribs).

Orphaned; picture of person with no apparent or asserted notability; uploaded for speedy deleted article. Michael Devore (talk) 16:33, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unencyclopedic personal photograph. Wikipedia is not MySpace and not a repository of personal photographs. •••Life of Riley (talk) 17:15, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Me-after-ball.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Me-after-ball.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by P.inkjeans (notify | contribs).

Orphaned; picture of person with no apparent or asserted notability. Michael Devore (talk) 16:36, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unencyclopedic personal photograph. Wikipedia is not MySpace and not a repository of personal photographs. •••Life of Riley (talk) 17:15, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

DSC016683.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC016683.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sigroc (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic; low-quality picture of cat subsequently replaced in Tortoiseshell cat article with better images. Michael Devore (talk) 16:39, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unencyclopedic personal photograph. Wikipedia is not MySpace and not a repository of personal photographs. •••Life of Riley (talk) 17:15, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

DSC01934.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC01934.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rcioffe (notify | contribs).

Orphaned; picture of person with no apparent or asserted notability (well, he does have a big tongue). Michael Devore (talk) 16:43, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unencyclopedic personal photograph. Wikipedia is not MySpace and not a repository of personal photographs. •••Life of Riley (talk) 17:15, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

P38.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:P38.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by KMEG (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, low quality. JaGa^talk 17:02, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unencyclopedic personal photograph. Wikipedia is not MySpace and not a repository of personal photographs. •••Life of Riley (talk) 17:15, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Tonyckey.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tonyckey.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by KMEG (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, low quality. JaGa^talk 17:02, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unencyclopedic personal photograph. Wikipedia is not MySpace and not a repository of personal photographs. •••Life of Riley (talk) 17:15, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Car sm.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Car sm.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Scriptoria (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, low quality image of the founder of a website that is now down. JaGa^talk 17:08, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

ByzantineEmpirepostcard.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ByzantineEmpirepostcard.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bigdaddy1204 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, replaced by File:Byzantine Empire animated2.gif. JaGa^talk 17:10, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

LimitedTheta.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:LimitedTheta.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Genick (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, difficult to read. JaGa^talk 17:18, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Danforth Township Iroquois.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Danforth Township Iroquois.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kranar drogin (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, replaced by File:Map highlighting Danforth Township, Iroquois County, Illinois.svg. JaGa^talk 17:21, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Brad2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brad2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by BradSox24 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, photograph of two unidentified persons. Possibly a picture of User:BradSox24, who has been absent from Wikipedia for 2½ years. •••Life of Riley (talk) 23:11, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Alicia Keys - Girlfriend - UK promo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alicia Keys - Girlfriend - UK promo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Funk Junkie (notify | contribs).

Image is close to identical artwork to that in the top of the article's infobox. The only differences (background colour and her position on the cover), can be described in text. Image fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 23:16, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Brandytop.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brandytop.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Malcolmo (notify | contribs).

Reversed image of that already in the article's lead. This small difference can be described with text alone - fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 23:17, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Blaque-BlaqueOut2007.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blaque-BlaqueOut2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nekoangel16 (notify | contribs).

Simple cover that can be described with text alone - fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 23:20, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pharrell Williams - Angel (DVD).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pharrell Williams - Angel (DVD).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by TopopMAC1 (notify | contribs).

Alternate cover identical to the lead image in the article, except for the background colour. Fails WP:NFCC#1 as replaceable with a short piece of (free) descriptive text. Peripitus (Talk) 23:21, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Gt heartland us album cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gt heartland us album cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mattg82 (notify | contribs).

Alternate cover identical to the lead image in the article, except for the background colour and some text moved. Fails WP:NFCC#1 as replaceable with a short piece of (free) descriptive text. Peripitus (Talk) 23:22, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

U2celeb fr.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:U2celeb fr.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dream out loud (notify | contribs).

CD Image that is just a centre crop of the lead non-free image in the article. Fails WP:NFCC#1 as replaceable with a short piece of (free) descriptive text. Peripitus (Talk) 23:23, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

BSpears-In-TheRemix.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:BSpears-In-TheRemix.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by QuasyBoy (notify | contribs).

Alternate cover identical to the lead image in the article, except the silhouette of her has been removed. Fails WP:NFCC#1 as replaceable with a short piece of (free) descriptive text. Peripitus (Talk) 23:23, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Jarsofclay muchafraidjapan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jarsofclay muchafraidjapan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Invisible hurricane (notify | contribs).

Alternate cover identical to the lead image in the article, except for the background colour the addition of the japanese text block. Fails WP:NFCC#1 as replaceable with a short piece of (free) descriptive text. Peripitus (Talk) 23:24, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

TanyaTuckerGirlsLikeMe.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:TanyaTuckerGirlsLikeMe.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Backspace (notify | contribs).

Alternate cover identical to the lead image in the article, except for the overlaying of the coloured blocks. Fails WP:NFCC#1 as replaceable with a short piece of (free) descriptive text. Peripitus (Talk) 23:26, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is the only cover available with the CD version of the album. The other (original) image is only available with the LP version of the album. This fact may be of significance to those whose only familiarity with the album is the CD version. Backspace (talk) 03:35, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pumpingonyourstereo2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pumpingonyourstereo2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Feathery Sunshine (notify | contribs).

CD 2 cover identical to the lead image in the article, except for the background colour. Fails WP:NFCC#1 as replaceable with a short piece of (free) descriptive text. Peripitus (Talk) 23:28, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

SG-MovingAlt.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:SG-MovingAlt.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by TwentiethApril1986 (notify | contribs).

CD 2 cover identical to the lead image in the article, except for the background outside of the bus. Fails WP:NFCC#1 as replaceable with a short piece of (free) descriptive text. Peripitus (Talk) 23:29, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Bfwritting.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bfwritting.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fizzerbear (notify | contribs).

Alternate cover largely identical to the lead image in the article, except for mostly the brightness and some text moved. Fails WP:NFCC#1 as replaceable with a short piece of (free) descriptive text. Peripitus (Talk) 23:30, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Fleetwood Mac - Future Games (green).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fleetwood Mac - Future Games (green).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Zeagler (notify | contribs).

Alternate cover largely identical to the lead image in the article, except for the background colour. Fails WP:NFCC#1 as replaceable with a short piece of (free) descriptive text. Peripitus (Talk) 23:31, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Lookwhatididmyfirsttime2art.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lookwhatididmyfirsttime2art.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fezmar9 (notify | contribs).

Alternate cover largely identical to the lead image in the article, except for colour changes. Fails WP:NFCC#1 as replaceable with a short piece of (free) descriptive text. Peripitus (Talk) 23:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Noyce Robert.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Noyce Robert.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Aaronmz (notify | contribs).

While the image has a source - the copyright holder is not identified. There are other non-free images available (say from the intel site) that could be sourced and do not have this issue. Current image fails the requirements of WP:NFCC#10a Peripitus (Talk) 23:49, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Hes-unidapter-mkII-box.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hes-unidapter-mkII-box.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by UnlimitedAccess (notify | contribs).

Replaceable non-free image. For the purposes of the article and reader understanding a free image could be taken of one of these still-existing items. While this image is copyright a photo of a simple object is not. Image fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 23:51, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2009_February_7&oldid=1140113444"